Our Practice —
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kenealy Vaidya LLP’s litigation practice excels in all aspects of intellectual property disputes, from complex patent litigation to trademark and trade secret disputes. Our attorneys have litigated cases before numerous U.S. District Courts, as well as, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC).
Our firm’s client centric approach to litigation begins with an in-depth assessment. We analyze the factual, technical and legal issues of the matter, in addition to developing a comprehensive understanding of our client’s business objectives. Armed with this information, our attorneys provide clients with prospective outcomes of a case, as well strategies for obtaining a possible early resolution.
- Louis Poulsen Lighting Inc. v. Spero Electric Corporation and Prospetto Light; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Civil Action No. 07-61019-CIV. Lead counsel in this trademark litigation involving Louis Poulsen Lighting’s famed PH Artichoke luminaire. On behalf of Louis Poulsen Lighting, case ended with the entry of a consent judgment (Document No. 72) against the Defendants, which included a permanent injunction prohibiting sales of the accused products.
- In the Matter of Certain Short-Wavelength Light Emitting Diodes, Laser Diodes and Products Containing Same; U.S. International Trade Commission; Investigation No. 337-TA-640; Lead counsel representing one of thirty four named respondents in this complex investigation involving accusations of patent infringement. Obtained a successful resolution in favor of our client.
- NSGDatacom v. Spatial Adventures, Inc. et al.; U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; Civil Action No. 1:08 cv 1159; Lead counsel in this case which resulted in a successful defense against claims of trade secret misappropriation.
- Integrated Liner Technologies, Inc. v. Specialty Silicone Products, Inc. et al.; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York; Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-1285. Lead counsel in this ongoing defense against accusations of patent infringement.